In this post, I want to show an application of fpqc descent (specifically, pro-Zariski descent) to a classical lemma about properness. Recall (EGA II, Thm 7.3.8) the valuative criterion of properness:

**Theorem.** *Let be a finite type morphism of locally Noetherian schemes. Then is proper if and only if for every commutative diagram*

where is a discrete valuation ring with fraction field , there exists a unique morphism making commutative the diagram

**Lemma.** *Suppose is a finite type morphism of locally Noetherian schemes. Then is proper if and only if for every Dedekind scheme and every closed point , every -morphism extends uniquely to .*

*Proof.* If is a discrete valuation ring with fraction field and maximal ideal , then is a Dedekind scheme, and . Thus, the condition of the lemma clearly implies properness, by the theorem above.

Conversely, suppose is proper, and let be a Dedekind scheme over , and a closed point. Write , and let . Let be the generic point of , and .

The valuative criterion shows that the the induced map extends uniquely to a -morphism . Moreover, since is an open immersion, the fibre product is the open .

Now is an fpqc cover of (in fact, a pro-Zariski cover). The above shows that and have the same restriction to . Since representable presheaves are sheaves for the fpqc topology (Tag 03O3), we thus see that they glue to a unique map .

**Remark.** Of the course, the classical proof of the lemma goes by noting that the morphism factors through some Zariski-open containing , since is of finite type over . The only thing that we changed is that we didn’t pass from the pro-Zariski to the Zariski covering, but instead argued directly using fpqc descent.